Legal Opinion

Pinnell v. Kelly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1912No. 7,646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom Johnson Circuit Court; William E. Deupree, Judge. Action by Edward Kelly against Julius W. Pinnell and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, J.

Appellee recovered in this action against appellants for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by their negligence. Appellants assign error of the trial court in overruling their demurrers to each paragraph of complaint, in overruling their motion for judgment upon interrogatories and answers returned thereto by the jury, notwithstanding the general verdict, and in overruling their motion for new trial. The complaint was in two paragraphs. The first paragraph is upon the theory that appellants were guilty of violating the statutes governing the guarding of machines used in factories.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. United States Cement Co. v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. M. S. Huey Co. v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klinger v. CAYLORIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. City of Terre Haute v. LaudaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Queen Coal & Mining Co. v. EppleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API