Legal Opinion

City of Terre Haute v. Lauda

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1915No. 8,568PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Vigo County; John E. Cox, Judge. Action by Maude R. Lauda against the City of Terre Haute. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in damages for $500, obtained by appellee against appellant for per*482sonal injuries alleged to have been caused by a defect in one of appellant’s streets.

The errors, properly assigned, presented and relied on for reversal are: the overruling of appellant’s motion to make the complaint more specific; the overruling of appellant’s demurrer to the amended complaint; the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; overruling appellant’s motion to strike out parts of the amended complaint; overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial;…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Peabody-Alwert Coal Co. v. YandellIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kahle v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Slifer v. WilliardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Cleveland,Cincinnati,Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LutzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Washburn-Crosby Co. v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API