Klinger v. CAYLOR
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, J.
Plaintiff-appellant brought her action in three pleading paragraphs against defendant-appellees, which consisted of physicians, surgeons, a clinic and hospital.
The first pleading- paragraph of complaint alleged that appellees Rusher, Kephart and Roe were practicing physicians and surgeons holding themselves out to be competent and skillful, and that appellees Harold D. Caylor, Truman E. Caylor, Eisamn, Dorance, and Talbert were partners doing business as the Caylor-Nickel Clinic, and Caylor-Nickel Hospital, Inc., and the Caylor-Nickel Research Foundation, Inc., operated a clinic which they…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brunswick Corporation v. Harold VinebergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Mayhew, Huston v. DEISTERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Woodward Insurance, Inc. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Dudley Sports Co. v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kordick v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Wright v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Ferdinand Furn. Co., Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.