Legal Opinion

Caffey v. Lane County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1983No. 16-81-08893; CA A23661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the circuit court’s affirmance on writ of review of the decision by a Lane County infractions hearings officer, which fined him $100 per dog and ordered the destruction of his two dogs for allegedly attacking a sheep.

ORS 34.040(1) provides that a writ of review should be allowed when the court or tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction. Pursuant to this provision, we must first determine whether the Lane County Infractions Section exceeded its jurisdiction in hearing civil cases in which the county is seeking civil redress of violations of county ordinances. We hold that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Astoria v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Russell v. Crook County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Rosboro Lumber Co. v. HeineOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caffey v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Columbia County School District No. 13 v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Caffey v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Caffey v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API