Legal Opinion
City of Astoria v. Cornelius
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The substance of the allegations of the writ is as follows: The plaintiff is a municipal corporation of Clatsop County. The defendant, T. S. Cornelius, is a duly elected and qualified county judge of Clatsop County and defendant, John Frye, is the duly elected qualified and acting county commissioner of said county of Clatsop, State of Oregon.
The writ sets forth Section 4600, Or. L., in full. That part deemed material to quote here, is as follows:
“It shall he, and is hereby made, the duty of the (county) court or commissioner’s court of each county in this state to levy a tax of not less than…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Union Fishermen's Co. v. ShoemakerOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. SteidelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State ex rel. Umatilla County v. HawksOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Peterson v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. State Public Welfare Commission v. County Court of Malheur CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Fehl v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.