Legal Opinion

Gitkin Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 8, 1967No. C.D. 2997PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved hi these cases, consolidated for trial, is described on the invoices as Philippine mahogany folding doors. The litigation has been limited to the articles designated on the invoices by the identifying numbers 2484, 250, and 150-P, and to the sizes 30 by 80 inches, 32 by 80 inches, 36 by 80 inches, and 48 by 80 inches. The merchandise was assessed with duty at 16% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 84 Treas. Dec.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Gitkin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Frazer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Venaire Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. A & P Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. A & P Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. D.N. & E. Walter Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API