Gitkin Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case is described on the invoices as “oval lauan slat folding doors,” “oval lauan mahogany folding doors,” and “Philippine mahogany folding doors.” It was imported from Japan and entered at the port of New York in December 1960 and January 1961. Duty was assessed at 16% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52373, supplemented by T.D. 52476, as manufactures of which wood is the component material of chief…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Joleo Impex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gitkin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- De Haan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Venaire Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- National Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.