B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bao, Chief Judge:
The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, is described on the invoices as louver doors or as bifold door units, in various sizes. Plaintiff’s brief limits the claim to single panels or two panels hinged together, in the following sizes:
Height: 78% inches
Widths: 834,11%, 13%, 14%, 15 %, 17%, and 23% inches
Thickness: 1% inches
The merchandise covered by protests 64/23411 and 65/16271 consists of two panels, hinged together and having certain hardware thereon. It appears that any claims as to wooden shoji doors in various sizes on the entry covered by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Gitkin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Gitkin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Frazer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
3Cited by14 opinions
- A & P Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- A & P Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- A. & P. Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.