Legal Opinion

B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 29, 1967No. C.D. 3020PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, is described on the invoices as louver doors or as bifold door units, in various sizes. Plaintiff’s brief limits the claim to single panels or two panels hinged together, in the following sizes:

Height: 78% inches

Widths: 834,11%, 13%, 14%, 15 %, 17%, and 23% inches

Thickness: 1% inches

The merchandise covered by protests 64/23411 and 65/16271 consists of two panels, hinged together and having certain hardware thereon. It appears that any claims as to wooden shoji doors in various sizes on the entry covered by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Gitkin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Gitkin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Frazer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. A & P Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. A & P Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. A. & P. Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API