Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Dencker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1910No. 8810PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered March 28, 1910, upon a trial .and conviction of the violation of an ordinance relating to the sale of goods by automatic vending machines.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, after trial upon conviction ■of the violation of an ordinance of the city of Seattle relating to the sale of goods by automatic vending machine, which ordinance reads as follows:

“An Ordinance licensing certain automatic devices, and providing a penalty for violation.
“Be it ordained by the city of Seattle as follows:
“Section (1) That it shall be unlawful for any person to maintain, keep, conduct, manage, have in his possession or control for use, any automatic device for the sale of goods of any,kind or character, where…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. John v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. City of Chicago v. Bowman Dairy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. City of Spokane v. MachoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Covington v. DalheimCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Texas Company v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API