St. John v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROft TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
. Mr. Justice McKenna
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff in error is a non-producing wholesale and retail milk ." dealer in the city of Buffalo, New York. In February, 1903, he exposed for sale and sold a quantity of milk in violation of-sections 20 and 22 of chapter 338 of the laws of New York for the year 1893, and its amendments and supplements, in that the said milk contained more than 88% of water and less than 12% of milk solids, to wit, 89.24% of water and' 10.36% of milk solids.
The Commissioner of Agriculture of the State in pursuance . of said laws filed a complaint against…
2Cited by49 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Zancanelli v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1918
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.