Legal Opinion
City of Spokane v. Macho
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1909No. 7365PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered March 7, 1908, dismissing a prosecution for the violation of an ordinance, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
— Defendant was arrested and charged with the violation of an ordinance of the city of Spokane, Washington, entitled, “An ordinance licensing and regulating the keepers of employment offices and the business of employment agencies in the city of Spokane, providing a penalty *323for the violation thereof,” etc. Among other matters covered by the ordinance, it is provided:
“Sec. 7. It shall be unlawful for any person keeping an employment office to make any wilful misrepresentations to any person seeking employment through such office, or to wilfully deceive any person seeking employment through…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Chicago v. RumpffIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Tugman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- In re CampWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Price v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Texas Company v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.