Legal Opinion

In re Milne

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1944No. 4827PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

Appellant, on October 31, 1939, filed in the United States Patent Office an application for a patent for “Pulp "Flow Distributors for Paper-Making and Board-Making Machines.”

Claim 18, being the only claim here involved, was rejected by the Primary Examiner on the ground of unpatentability over the cited ■ prior art. Upon appeal the rejection was affirmed by the Board of Appeals.

Said claim 18 reads as follows:

18. The combination with a paper-making machine of a unitary flow-distributor construction comprising, a box having bottom, outer, inner, and side walls and provided with an inlet in its…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re LaurentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of KamletCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Bissell Inc. v. ER Wagner Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1962
  4. Application of CarterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  5. Application of Frederick A. HesselCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API