Legal Opinion

Application of Frederick A. Hessel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 2 in appellant’s application 1 for “Secondary Recovery Method.”

It appears that economical recovery of oil from oil-bearing sands by natural flow or usual pumping methods is often hindered by (1) a decrease in the natural gas pressure in the oil formation which drives the oil toward the well, and (2) absorption of certain residual amounts of oil upon the sand particles. To obviate that problem the prior art has employed water flooding techniques in which water…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of Alvin E. NehrenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. In re MilneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. Application of SuttonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  4. Application of Hideo WatanabeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. In re HampelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of Noel F. HamiltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API