Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scardamaglia

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 10, 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

We consider again the circumstances, if any, in which a criminal defendant may challenge the use against him of evidence obtained in or as a result of a search and seizure that allegedly violated another’s rights under art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. The concept has been called target standing.

After a jury-waived trial, the defendant was found guilty of trafficking in cocaine, of unlawfully possessing cocaine with intent to distribute it, and of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, all based on evidence that the police seized at his home on September 4, 1987,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. VacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. BurgosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. WatersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API