Commonwealth v. Scardamaglia
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
We consider again the circumstances, if any, in which a criminal defendant may challenge the use against him of evidence obtained in or as a result of a search and seizure that allegedly violated another’s rights under art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. The concept has been called target standing.
After a jury-waived trial, the defendant was found guilty of trafficking in cocaine, of unlawfully possessing cocaine with intent to distribute it, and of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, all based on evidence that the police seized at his home on September 4, 1987,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. VacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BurgosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. WatersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.