Aimbridge Employee Service Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, et al.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION AIMBRIDGE EMPLOYEE SERVICE § CORP., § § Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-1014 § Judge Mazzant NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS § BOARD, et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are two motions: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #25) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #27) (collectively, the “Motions”). Having considered the Motions and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the Motions should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND This…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.