Legal Opinion

Smith v. Roe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Dolores County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

. Stone, J.

Suit was brought in the court below by appellee to recover the sum of $1,000, upon an alleged contract for services in negotiating the sale of'certain mining claims of appellant. The complaint alleged that in February, 1880, the appellant, Smith, agreed with the appellee, Roe, that if said Roe would assist in the sale of four certain mines, he (Smith) would, in case said mines were sold on or before the 15th day of May, 1880, pay to said Roe $250 for each of said mines so sold before said 15th day of May; and that Smith then and thefe made and delivered to Roe four checks on the M.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Consolidated Pet Foods, Inc. (In Re S & D Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  2. Sharshel v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Fisk Mining & Milling Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API