Legal Opinion

Sharshel v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1919No. 9274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Yuma District Court, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

This action was instituted by defendants in error as plaintiffs, against plaintiffs in error as defendants, and for convenience the parties will be so designated. The action was apparently intended as one in unlawful detainer, but both parties pleaded title, and the manner of deraignment thereof, and judgment was rendered vesting title to the premises involved, in the plaintiffs, so that the action was in fact tried as one to quiet title.

The complaint alleged that the defendants, Sharshel, entered into possession of the premises, being a quarter section of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shew v. . CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Byers v. Denver Circle R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Boulder & Beaver Placer Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  4. Smith v. RoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Walker Investment Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API