Fisk Mining & Milling Co. v. Reed
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
In support of a petition for rehearing, it is urged that the agent of the defendant who promised to pay for the pumping had authority only with respect to the current affairs of the company, and no authority as to matters which were past. For the past pumping, *520standing alone, this proposition might be correct, but in view of the fact that this agent had authority, generally, to contract for the drainage of the company’s-mine, he would have the right, in the absence of any notice to the plaintiffs to the contrary, to arrange for those matters in the past which were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. ReesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- King v. De CourseySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
- Smith v. RoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883