Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Monro

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1912No. 9862PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered June 24, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for money paid, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

There is no serious dispute as to the facts in this action. On April 15, 1909, defendants’ predecessors in interest, as landlords, executed and delivered to plaintiff’s *230predecessor in interest, as tenant, a five-year lease upon an apartment house, in the city of Seattle, for a rental of $36,000, payable from the 1st to the 5th of each month in advance installments of $600 each. At the commencement of the term, the lessee made the first payment, and also deposited with the lessors the sum of $1,200, relative to which the lease contained the following material stipulations:

“Party of the second…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madler v. SilverstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dutton v. ChristieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McDaniels v. GoweyWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Burns Trading Co. v. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Schoen v. New Britain Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Central Trust Co. v. WolfMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Smith v. Lambert Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API