Legal Opinion
United States v. Danny C. Christopher, Jack Herer, John B. Michel, John Gefall, and Kenneth R. Klotz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1983No. 82-1149 to 82-1151, 82-1156 and 82-1203PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge.
OVERVIEW
Appellants appeal their misdemeanor convictions on charges of being present on federal property after normal work hours in violation of 41 C.F.R. §§ 101-20.302 and 101-20.315 (1981). 1 Appellants contend that (1) the- information was vague and indefinite; (2) they were selectively prosecuted; (3) there was insufficient evidence to establish every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt; and (4) the regulation is unconstitutional. We reject these arguments. Appellant Michel contends that he was improperly arraigned and tried in his absence. We agree.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Mark Kevin BinderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. George I. BennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. BliesnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Michael H. Weitzenhoff Thomas W. MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Robert E. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.