Legal Opinion

Duncan v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 1984No. CIV-82-599-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Defendants have filed their motion for summary judgment, asserting that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that, on the basis of the undisputed facts, they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Motion has been fully briefed on both sides, and a hearing has been held pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiffs sue individually and as parents and next friend of their daughter, Suzanne, who has Down’s Syndrome or mongolism. They seek an injunction against the Secretary of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rutherford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Rutherford v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Carnohan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacob v. CurtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
  2. Oklahoma Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics v. FogartyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Cowan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1998
  4. DeVito v. Hem, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. OKLAHOMA CHAP. OF AMER. ACA., PEDIAT. v. FogartyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API