Carnohan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Michael Carnohan brought a declaratory proceeding to secure the right to obtain and use laetrile in a nutritional program for the prevention of cancer. The district court held that the controversy properly fell within the primary jurisdiction of the federal and state administrative agencies charged with evaluating new drug applications and therefore dismissed the action. We affirm.
When Congress passed the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301 to 392, in 1938, it established administrative machinery regulating the marketing of new drugs. The act “rests upon the constitutional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. PriviteraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. WalshSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rutherford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by21 opinions
- Biotics Research Corporation v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc., Seroyal Brands, Inc. v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Alice Sammon v. New Jersey Board Of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- U.S. Citizens Association v. Kathleen SebeliuxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Montana Cannabis Industry Ass'n v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.