Legal Opinion

Wm. R. Hague, Inc. v. Sandburg

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 29, 2006No. 2:06-cv-00363PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WATSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff asserts, inter alia, claims of federal trademark infringement and common law breach of contract. This matter is before the Court on defendant Eugene Sandburg’s (“Sandburg”) motion to dismiss or transfer or, in the alternative, to stay (Doc. 10). For the following reasons, the Court grants Sandburg’s motion in part and denies it in part.

I. Facts

Plaintiff Wm. R. Hague, Inc. (“Hague Water”) is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Groveport, Ohio. Plaintiff is in the business of manufacturing and marketing water softeners…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nova U.S. Inc. v. DisimoneDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
  2. RRI Associates LLC v. Huntington Way Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API