Legal Opinion
State v. Neal
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 8, 1982No. Nos. 156395, 156991, 157847, 157906, 157861, 158049, 158215 and 158427, CA A20784PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The state appeals a District Court order granting defendants’ motions to dismiss on the ground that defendants were denied their constitutional right to speedy trial. We reverse and remand for trial.
The district court adopted the stipulated facts prepared by the parties. On October 1, 1980, the Marion County District Attorney publicly announced that his office would not prosecute certain “shoplifting” cases filed after September 29, 1980, until a staffing shortage in his office was resolved. On October 10, 1980, the presiding judge of the District Court advised the District Attorney of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986