Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hale

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 16, 1986No. 21-777; CA A35393Published

1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.

I would affirm defendant’s conviction.

I read the majority’s opinion to say that the only *284prejudice that defendant suffered was anxiety.1 I would hold that, without more, anxiety, no matter how prolonged, cannot be the basis for a dismissal for want of a speedy trial. In this case, no prejudice to defendant was shown.

In State v. Dykast, 300 Or 368, 378, 712 P2d 79 (1985) the Supreme Court explained:

“Most criminal prosecutions cause stress, discomfort and interference with a normal life. Delay adds to the problem.”

In Dykast, there was evidence that the delay caused the defendant to postpone his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. DykastOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API