State v. Hale
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.
I would affirm defendant’s conviction.
I read the majority’s opinion to say that the only *284prejudice that defendant suffered was anxiety.1 I would hold that, without more, anxiety, no matter how prolonged, cannot be the basis for a dismissal for want of a speedy trial. In this case, no prejudice to defendant was shown.
In State v. Dykast, 300 Or 368, 378, 712 P2d 79 (1985) the Supreme Court explained:
“Most criminal prosecutions cause stress, discomfort and interference with a normal life. Delay adds to the problem.”
In Dykast, there was evidence that the delay caused the defendant to postpone his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DykastOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.