Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fragoso v. Fell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 10, 2005No. 2 CA-SA 2005-0001Published

1Dissent

FLÓREZ, Presiding Judge,

dissenting.

¶24 I respectfully dissent. Although I agree that special action jurisdiction is appropriate for the reasons stated in the majority opinion, I would grant relief because, in my view, cash-only bail violates the right to bail by sufficient sureties guaranteed by article II, § 22(A) of the Arizona Constitution. Moreover, I do not agree that the relevant procedural rules and statute clearly and unambiguously permit a cash-only restriction on bail; I would construe them otherwise, in harmony with my interpretation of the constitutional provision.

¶ 25 Article II,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API