Fragoso v. Fell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Dissent
FLÓREZ, Presiding Judge,
dissenting.
¶24 I respectfully dissent. Although I agree that special action jurisdiction is appropriate for the reasons stated in the majority opinion, I would grant relief because, in my view, cash-only bail violates the right to bail by sufficient sureties guaranteed by article II, § 22(A) of the Arizona Constitution. Moreover, I do not agree that the relevant procedural rules and statute clearly and unambiguously permit a cash-only restriction on bail; I would construe them otherwise, in harmony with my interpretation of the constitutional provision.
¶ 25 Article II,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.