Legal Opinion
Bixler v. Pierson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 19, 1966No. 219PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
188 So.2d 681 (1966)
S. Fordham BIXLER, Dorothy Alexander, David Serafin and W. Richards, Appellants,
v.
Floyd H. PIERSON, Appellee.
No. 219.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
July 19, 1966.
William H. Robbinson and Robert Dyer, of Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson, Mesmer & Robbinson, Orlando, for appellants.
Edward R. Kirkland, of Kirkland, Johnson, Smith & Ervin, Orlando, for appellee.
WALDEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final decree which denied a petition for mandatory injunction. The petition was aimed at defendant-appellee, Floyd H. Pierson. Its purpose was to obtain the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Goodrich v. SelligmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Benger Laboratories Ltd. v. R. K. Laros Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hofgesang v. KaseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lewis v. City of Atlantic BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- City of Marion v. RappSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Mossman v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- 3m Nat. Advertising Co. v. City of Tampa Code Enf. Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Anderson v. Department of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.