Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Department of Ecology

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 25, 1983No. 9973-6-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, C.J.

Facts of Case

A property owner, James Anderson, appeals from a judgment affirming a decision by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (Board) which upheld an order issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Department) requiring him to remove mobile homes and fill from his property located within the Skagit River flood zone.

The property owner's property on which he operates the Rivershore Mobile Home Park is located in Mount Vernon, Washington between dikes within the floodway of the Ska-git River. In 1975, he filled a portion of his property, and the Department of Ecology allowed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Maple Leaf Investors, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Sioux Falls v. ClevelandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bixler v. PiersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Department of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. United States v. 19.7 Acres of LandWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Spokane ex rel. Wastewater Management Department v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. United States v. 313.34 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Jefferson County, State of Washington, Etc., Jeffrey Jay Kamp Jill Jay KampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. 313.34 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Jefferson County, State of Washington, Etc., Jeffrey Jay Kamp Jill Jay KampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API