Legal Opinion

Ray Reilly's Tire Mart, Inc. v. F. P. Elnicki, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 4, 1987No. 86-211PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s decision in an action brought to recover the price of tires supplied to defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff supplied and installed tires on defendant’s truck at the request of Foster Motors, Inc., d/b/a Mid-State Trucks. Defendant had purchased a dump truck from Foster Motors, which proved to be difficult to handle while hauling the heavy loads involved in defendant’s excavation business. Foster Motors made several attempts to remedy the problem, including having the plaintiff replace the tire rims. At Foster Motors’ request, a Michelin representative examined…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Morrisville Lumber Co., Inc. v. OkcuogluSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Finley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Murray v. J & B International Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Cedric Electric, Inc. v. SheaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dj Painting, Inc. v. Baraw Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Gregg Beldock v. VWSD, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  5. In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API