Legal Opinion

Bond v. Armstrong

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 8720PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, C. J.

— Action upon the bond of a guardian. The-original complaint in this case was entitled, “The State of' Indiana, on the relation of James Martin, guardian of George Armstrong, a minor, etc., vs. Mary Bond,” and others, named. The appellants demurred jointly to the complaint,, for want of facts, and because of defect of parties plaintiffs “ in this, to wit: George Armstrong is the proper party plaintiff.” The appellant Mary Bond also filed a separate demurrer, for want of facts. Pending the consideration of these-demurrers, according to the recital of a bill of exceptions,, entitled in the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Cremer v. HigginsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
  3. Stamford Bank v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  4. Trullinger v. KofoedOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  5. King v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Conduitt v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. LohgesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Broatch v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Rush v. State ex rel. BixlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Loogootee v. LarkinIndiana Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API