State ex rel. Broatch v. Moores
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
In this, an original action in quo warranto, opinions have already been filed on two occasions. On the first *286the court discussed the merits of a demurrer to the answer of the respondent, and it was held, by a divided court, that the information stated a cause of action and the answer a defense. (State v. Moores, 52 Neb. 770.) The case was then referred for a trial of the issues, and later came before the court on motions, on the one side for a judgment of ouster, and on the other to set aside the referee’s report in favor of the relator. (State v. Moores, 56 Neb. 1.) A judgment of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Thayer v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Willard v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- State ex rel. Glenn v. SteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Frazer v. State ex rel. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Broatch v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LenahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Baker v. Department of RegistrationUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. Scott, County Com'r.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Edney v. BaumNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical TherapyNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.