Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Broatch v. Moores

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1899No. 9249PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

In this, an original action in quo warranto, opinions have already been filed on two occasions. On the first *286the court discussed the merits of a demurrer to the answer of the respondent, and it was held, by a divided court, that the information stated a cause of action and the answer a defense. (State v. Moores, 52 Neb. 770.) The case was then referred for a trial of the issues, and later came before the court on motions, on the one side for a judgment of ouster, and on the other to set aside the referee’s report in favor of the relator. (State v. Moores, 56 Neb. 1.) A judgment of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thayer v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Willard v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. State ex rel. Glenn v. SteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Frazer v. State ex rel. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Broatch v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LenahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Baker v. Department of RegistrationUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. Scott, County Com'r.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Edney v. BaumNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical TherapyNebraska Supreme Court · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API