Llewellyn Iron Works v. Littlefield
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered May 6, 1912, in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— The purpose of this action is to foreclose a lien for labor and materials.
On August 4, 1910, the defendants, J. W. Littlefield and wife, were the owners of lot 7, Supplemental Plat to Glenn *87Park addition' to the city of Seattle. On this day they and the plaintiff entered into a written contract, whereby it was provided that the latter should install in a building which was on the above described premises an electric auto-push button elevator for the sum of $1,765. The provisions of this contract, so far as material at this time, are two, the first of which is:
“This company [referring to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foxell v. . FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ward v. ThorndykeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Malo v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Hills v. Gardiner Savings InstitutionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Timms v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Maffett v. EmmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Mondioli & Stewart v. American Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.