Legal Opinion

Maffett v. Emmons

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1948No. 5077PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellant seeks review of an adverse judgment arising out of a suit to collect a note which reads as follows:

“$8,467.68 Albuquerque, N. M., July 10, 1946 — On Demand — After Date, I, We, Or Either Of Us, Promise To Pay Tp The Order Of Virgil I. Strickland, Hot Springs, N. M. at The First National Bank, Hot Springs, N. M. — Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Seven And 68/100 — Dollars at its office with interest from Date until paid, at the rate of 5 per cent per annum, with ten per cent additional on amount unpaid, should this note be placed in the hands of an attorney for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trigg v. ArnottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Scholbe v. SchuchardtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. RenshawMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Barron v. BoyntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  5. Llewellyn Iron Works v. LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Schoonover v. CaudillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hondo Oil & Gas Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Weinstock v. L. A. Carpet, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API