Legal Opinion

Ward v. Thorndyke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1911No. 9477PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Stéiner, J., entered January 28, 1911, in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— Action by appellants to recover $406.80, with interest on $200 thereof from December 19, 1909, and on $206.80 thereof from February 15, 1909, at-six per cent per annum, and to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. The claim was ■for plumbing and installing a heating plant in the residence of respondents under a verbal contract.

*12The plaintiffs claim that the agreement was that they should do the work for $380, of which $200 was to be paid in cash when the roughing in was completed, and the remainder by a secured note, payable in sixty days after completion of the work; that when the roughing in was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. NaherWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Griesemer v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Llewellyn Iron Works v. LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Stimson Mill Co. v. Feigenson Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Spokane Security Finance Co. v. DelanoWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API