Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Bullick
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-5127PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings claims against defendants for defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship and the case is governed by Pennsylvania law. Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, both motions are granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The complaint alleges that Sarah Weinstein (“Weinstein”) was abducted in November 1991 from a street in the City of Philadelphia by an unknown assailant who thereafter…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mollan v. LindnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hansen v. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Corbett v. MorgensternDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Martin v. City of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.