Legal Opinion

Meylor v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 25, 1979No. 62626PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

This appeal questions the applicability of the promissory estoppel doctrine to the statute of frauds which is in the Uniform Commercial Code. See § 554.2201, The Code 1977; Warder & Lee Elevator, Inc. v. Britten, 274 N.W.2d 339 (Iowa 1979). We had not yet decided Warder & Lee when the trial court gave judgment in this case. The trial court stated at that time, “The direct conflict between the Statute of Frauds and the doctrine of promissory estoppel must be ultimately resolved by the Supreme Court.”

The pleadings and affidavit of plaintiff Dean E. Meylor assert the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Frohwein v. HaesemeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Warder & Lee Elevator, Inc. v. BrittenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Bahnsen v. RabeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. McCubbin Seed Farm, Inc. v. Tri-Mor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Iowa Bankers Ass'n v. Iowa Credit Union DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Millwright v. RomerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Courier Times, Inc. v. United Feature Syndicate, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Farm & City Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API