Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Alexander Smogor

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 8, 1969No. 17173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s petition for rehearing presents two arguments: 1) that he exhausted all available administrative remedies and 2) that his order to report for induction was improperly issued. The district court precluded the defendant from presenting evidence relating to the legality of his selective service classification as a defense to the criminal prosecution for failure to report for induction. Essentially, defendant Smogor asserts that his I-A classification and subsequent order to report for induction were invalid and that he should have been given a conscientious objector…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. David Arthur GeareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Ernest Douglas Brede v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Cupit v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Layne Ronald RabeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Thomas Mitchell GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Everett Laverne AyresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. QuattrucciDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1971
  5. United States ex rel. Johnson v. McBeeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API