Legal Opinion

Wittick v. Miles

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an agreement based on an earnest money receipt for the purchase of real and personal property. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit in that plaintiffs had failed to allege payment of the purchase price into court. The trial court sustained the demurrer. Plaintiffs refused to plead over and the trial court dismissed the suit. Plaintiffs appeal.

The essential facts as alleged in the complaint are as follows. On August 2, 1972, plaintiffs signed an earnest money receipt…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Milton v. HareOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Guillaume v. K. S. D. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Woods v. DixonOregon Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Davidson v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gaffi v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cook v. DeslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API