United States Ex Rel. Gladney v. Peters
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Presently before this court is David Gladney’s petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Gladney’s sole assertion is that he was denied due process of law because the instructions given to the jury at trial allowed the jury to return a verdict of murder despite findings that should have resulted in a verdict of voluntary manslaughter. For the reasons stated below, the petition for writ of habe-as corpus is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Gladney was convicted of murder,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sawyer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Lynch v. SandahlDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Hartfield v. GramleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- United States ex rel. Cuevas v. WashingtonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- United States ex rel. Bosek v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- United States ex rel. Daniel v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992