Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Daniel v. Peters

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 7, 1992No. 91 C 6108Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLDERMAN, District Judge:

Erwin Daniel has petitioned the court for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Daniel’s sole basis for relief is that the jury instructions given at trial on murder and voluntary manslaughter violated his due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

FACTS

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Daniel was convicted of murder and aggravated battery and sentenced to 35 years in prison. The underlying facts are taken from the opinion of the Illinois appellate court on direct review, and are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. People v. ReddickIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Phyllis Falconer v. Michael P. Lane and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Jimmie L. Morrison v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API