Legal Opinion
Hirshberg v. Appel
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 30, 1929PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
This plaintiff, an old man unable to read, or to write more than his name, in English, brings this action in tort, alleging that he was the president, treasurer, a director and the largest stockholder in the Macy Furniture Company, a corporation in which his wife, Bose, and his stepson, George Bornstein, son of Bose, were minority stockholders; that he knew and trusted Bernard Appel, brother of Bose, with whom he had many dealings; that being in ill health and desiring to visit Palestine in June, 1926, he told Appel of his condition and wishes and asked him to advise and assist Bornstein in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brewer v. Proprietors of the Boston TheatreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Hayden v. Perfection Cooler Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Loughery v. Central Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Willett v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Converse v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Symmons v. O'KeeffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Comerford v. MeierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Shaw v. HardingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Halebian v. BervCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.