Legal Opinion
Clark v. Airavada Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 14, 1998No. CV-S-96-780-PMP (LRL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PRO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Airavada Corporation’s (“Airavada”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 40) filed on February 27, 1998. Plaintiff Ronald Clark (“Clark”) filed an Opposition (# 54) on April 27, 1998. On May 11, 1998, Airavada filed a Reply (# 57).
I. Summary Judgment Standard
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MBKS Co. Ltd. v. ReddyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- 24th Street Holdings LLC v. BP Products North America Incorporated, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Hendrik Block v. 7-Eleven, IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021