Legal Opinion

Booker v. Killion

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1902No. 4,169PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Daviess Circuit Court; J. T. Rodgers, Special Judge. Action by Alexander Killion against Owen O. Booker and others in ejeotment and to recover possession of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Appellee brought this action in ejectment against appellants and Rankin and Rankin to recover possession of certain real estate described in the complaint. Appellants answered by general denial. Rankin and Rankin filed a disclaimer. The court made, upon proper request, a special finding of facts, stated conclusions of law thereon, and rendered judgment in favor of appellee and against appellants for the possession of the land and for one cent damages.'

Upon this appeal the error assigned is that the court erred in its conclusions of law upon the facts found. Ap*197pellee, before discussing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Midland Railway Co. v. DickasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Wabash Railroad v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Coan v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Barner v. BaylessIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lett v. Eastern Moline Plow Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. City of Huntingburg v. State Ex Rel. OlingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API