Northern Assurance Co. v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 11, 1938:
Fowler, J.
Our disposition of the case only requires us to discuss the defendant’s claims that regardless of other matters the judgment is correct because, (1) the cause of action under the statute is neither assignable nor, (2) subject to the law of subrogation; (3) the action does not lie because the streetcar company did not itself file a claim with the city council as required by the statute; and the claim of the plaintiffs that, (4) upon the evidence and the stipulated facts they are entitled to judgment according to the prayer of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Ely v. . Supervisors of Niagara CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- County of Allegheny v. Gibson's Son & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Marshall v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dworak v. TempelIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- A. & B. Auto Stores of Jones Street, Inc. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- United States Guarantee Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Protection Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.