Legal Opinion
Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1970No. 4PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The principal issue raised on this appeal can be stated as follows: Does sec. 66.091, Stats., place the city within the position of a tort-feasor, thereby requiring the respondents upon payment to their insureds to be subrogated to their insureds’ rights against the city?
By demurring to the respondents’ complaint, the city of Milwaukee (hereinafter the “appellant”) has conceded the truth of all allegations of fact and has challenged only the conclusion of law resulting therefrom. D’Amato v. Freeman Printing Co. (1968), 38 Wis. 2d 589, 157 N. W. 2d 686; Jenkins v. State (1961), 13 Wis. 2d 503,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Perkins v. WorzalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- William Burford Company v. Glasgow Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- D'AMATO v. Freeman Printing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Frederick v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Sambs v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- A. & B. Auto Stores of Jones Street, Inc. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Employers Health Insurance v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.