North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The appeal presents for review the ruling of the trial court on these two questions: 1. Under the principles of the common law has the State, by reason of its sovereignty, the prerogative right to prefer its claim over the claims of other like depositors, for its deposits made on open account in a bank which has become insolvent ? 2. If so, is the appellant, upon paying the amount due the State by the insolvent bank, entitled to be subrogated to the preferred rights of the State ? The second question need not be considered if the first is answered in the negative.
Since the right, if existent,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RaineyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Potter v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Commissioner of Banking v. Chelsea Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WoodroofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Sholtz Ex Rel. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BruckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. CarlyonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.