Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Brucker
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1933No. 26,128PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The appellant surety company filed an intervening petition in the receivership of the Farmers State Bank of Monticello, seeking to have allowed a ciaim in the sum of $10,000, with priority of payment over general creditors. Its claim arose as follows: The bank petitioned the state board of finance to be designated as a depository of public funds (to the maximum amount of $20,000), filing with such application a “surety company bond of Depository of Public Funds” in the penal sum of $10,000, with appellant as surety thereon. The application and bond were approved and the state of Indiana…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Sholtz Ex Rel. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- State of Indiana v. Stultz, ReceiverIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Department of Treasury v. Reinking, ReceiverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.