United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rainey
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal and.writ of error from, tbe Chancery Court of Davidson County. — John Allison, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister
The present litigation was evolved from the defalcation of Walter S. Rainey, clerk of the First and Second circuit courts of Davidson county.
It appears from the record that, when Walter S'. Rainey entered upon his duties as clerk of the First and Second circuit courts, he executed three oficial bonds, one for $5,000 known as the “revenue bond,” a second for $10,000, known as the “oficial bond,” and a third for $5,000, known as the “special” or “receiver’s” bond, conditioned to cover property or funds which might at any time come to the hands of such clerk as special commissioner and receiver…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Johnson v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Leeper v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
- Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Commissioner of Banking v. Chelsea Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.