Legal Opinion

Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A.G. v. McGrath Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 22, 1951No. 10464PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this civil action to recover shares of stock in certain American corporations, which shares had been seized by and vested in the Alien Property Custodian. The underlying and surrounding circumstances are extended and complicated. For present purposes we need state only the few which control the conclusion to the controversy.

On October 5, 1931, Wilhelm and Marta von Opel, who were then and always remained nationals of Germany, gave, by a written instrument, to their son, Fritz, six hundred shares of stock in a German corporation. The instrument…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fritz Von Opel v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A.G. v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  3. UEBERSEE FINANZ-KORPORATION, ETC. v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
  4. Opel v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A.G. v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API