Fritz Von Opel v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
In Uebersee Finanz-Korp., A. G. v. McGrath, 343 U.S. 205, 72 S.Ct. 618, 96 L.Ed. 888, the Supreme Court decided that Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, a Swiss corporation, referred to as Uebersee, was not entitled to recover from the Alien Property Custodian 1 certain property owned by Uebersee prior to the time it was vested by the Custodian in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act. 2 The property consisted principally of shares of stock of two American corporations. Uebersee, claiming not to be an enemy, in 1945 sued under section 9(a) of the Act to recover the property.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Schattner v. Girard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Von Clemm v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Eric G. Kaufman v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Ernest Attenhofer v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- N. v. Handelsbureau La Mola v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.